As the aged care sector continues to navigate the rollout of Support at Home assessments, operational friction surrounding funding decisions remains a central focus. An ABC Four Corners investigation, led by journalist Anne Connolly (who previously broke the “Who Cares?” story that contributed to triggering the Aged Care Royal Commission eight years ago), has drawn national attention to the Integrated Assessment Tool (IAT) and the algorithm used to determine funding levels. The Commonwealth Ombudsman is investigating complaints regarding the tool, while a Senate Committee inquiry continues alongside it.
For providers, maintaining client trust while system processes evolve requires a clear understanding of key friction points and practical strategies to guide clients through them.
What the IAT Actually Is
Since Support at Home replaced Home Care Packages and Short-Term Restorative Care on 1 November 2025, every client requires an assessment or reassessment via the IAT, a digital assessment completed by an assessor during a home visit. Built from 11 clinically validated assessment tools covering mobility, cognition, daily living, and emotional wellbeing, the tool processes responses into scores that assign each individual to one of eight funding levels.
The underlying objective is clear: a single, standardised process replacing the previous patchwork of assessment organisations, paired with clearer funding classifications. However, feedback from across the sector and national coverage points to significant operational challenges for providers.
Key Challenges in Support at Home Assessments
- Algorithm Limitations: Each of the 11 integrated tools contains a margin of error that can compound when aggregated into a single output score. Clinicians and advocacy groups, including the Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine, note that the tool can under-represent frailty, cognitive decline, and complex mental health conditions—needs that are less easily captured by structured digital questionnaires than physical mobility restrictions.
- Reduced Assessor Discretion: At launch, assessors could no longer adjust classification outcomes on the spot based on professional judgment. Following this shift on 1 November 2025, review requests rose significantly, from approximately 170 in the previous financial year to nearly 1,000 cases. In response to sector pressure, the government introduced an interim escalation pathway allowing assessors to flag complex cases, while the Senate passed the Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments) Bill 2026 in July 2026 to push for statutory override authority and backdated reassessments. A rapid review of the IAT prioritization mechanism also remains underway alongside the Ombudsman’s inquiry.
- Reassessment Delays & Interim Budgets: Reassessments often take up to 90 days, with roughly a quarter conducted remotely. While waiting for outcomes, clients frequently rely on interim funding allocations, placing operational pressure on providers striving to deliver adequate care while administrative determinations are pending.
What This Means for Home Care Providers
Care management teams are typically the primary point of contact for families navigating unexpected assessment outcomes. Managing these challenges effectively relies on meticulous record-keeping and proactive communication:
- Help Clients Through Reviews: Maintain updated care plans, clinical notes, and allied health assessments. Detailed documentation provides essential evidence for My Aged Care review requests and supports escalation pathways as review options evolve.
- Manage Interim Budgets Carefully: Maintain precise care allocations and clear documentation to ensure budget adjustments can be processed smoothly once finalised funding levels are confirmed.
- Plan for Reassessment Lags: Incorporate the 90-day reassessment timeline into forward rostering and financial planning to mitigate service delivery interruptions.
- Be Upfront with Families: Heightened public awareness means families increasingly recognise when an initial assessment outcome may not align with care needs. Proactively explaining the assessment process and outlining the steps taken to advocate on their behalf helps establish and preserve client trust.
Looking Ahead
Large-scale structural transitions inevitably involve adjustment periods, and the IAT evaluation framework continues to refine its operational model. Between departmental reviews, formal inquiries, and ongoing legislative discussions surrounding human override authority, further policy adjustments are expected before the system stabilizes. Providers that track assessment progress systematically and keep clinical records updated will remain best positioned to deliver consistent, high-quality care.
Integrating robust care management software further supports these operations by allowing teams to track assessment statuses and manage interim alongside confirmed budgets within a single workflow.
Want to stay ahead of the upcoming aged care reforms?